they finally ousted him

[PATRIOT73]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23213740

but wiv 5kids in uk

[astral276]

Like Arnie... he'll be back.

[kreativebargains]

It cost £2 million, and that's without what he claimed while he was here. And we are still paying for his family. Maybe they want to go to Jordan to support him during his trial, another half a dozen plane tickets just to finally finish this debacle.

[RonOne]

I'm glad he's gone,
But I still think if the european courts over ruled us he should have been kept in jail in Strasbourg.
After all, they took the case out of our hands.

[buttons-and-bows]

I actually stayed awake last night to make sure he got to the airbase and on the plane, I think they should have sent his family with him, who is going to keep them ..........Oh yes i forgot, stupid question button

[PATRIOT73]

Like Arnie... he'll be back.

if he enters uk wont he be refused n sent back?

? now is will his kids do his biddin ere in uk

[RonOne]

if he enters uk wont he be refused n sent back?

? now is will his kids do his biddin ere in uk

That depends on whether they have a conscious.
Lets hope daddy's influence went with him.

[PATRIOT73]

That depends on whether they have a conscious.
Lets hope daddy's influence went with him.

wudnt holdya breathe tho

[astral276]

if he enters uk wont he be refused n sent back?

? now is will his kids do his biddin ere in uk

He would likely claim that being kept apart from his family breached his human rights, the European Court would side with him, decree that the UK had to allow him in, and the UK government (of whatever party) would do as they were dictated to do - as they always do.

It's odd that people like this demand the human rights they wish to deny everyone else.

[westlondoncarparts]

This matter has been through legal process and he has been deported.

He cannot come back to the UK.

Comments in this thread about him coming back to the UK because of his family are groundless.

The matter was never taken out of the UK’s hands. The UK is part of the European Human Rights Convention, was one of the main drivers behind the establishment of the European Human Rights Convention, and British legal personnel had the biggest hand in drafting the European Human Rights Convention related legislation. The British are not separate from it, we are part of it. The problem with this situation was the incompetence of the UK Ministry of Justice and the Home Office in failing to understand the application of the relevant law that the UK helped to create and of then undertaking the appropriate problem solving. Both the British Courts and Strasburg kept telling the British Government what the problem was. Had the British Government listened and taken appropriate actions rather than ignoring the decisions of the Courts, this matter would have been concluded much earlier.

If the always complaining British want to talk about human rights, then a cursory glance through pages such as the following will show the consequences of the UK abusing the human rights of Iraqi people when it did not recognize the territorial sovereignty of a state that it previously had a hand in creating and invaded the country illegally. The consequences of that British violation includes a high number of orphaned children, a high number of families where the head of the household is now a woman and where there are no equal employment opportunities for men and women, increases in cancer and other health conditions resulting from exposure to mutagenic and carcinogenic agents such as like depleted uranium from munitions, and so on. If British people want to start complaining about human rights, they should see what the Iraqis have suffered as a consequence of British actions. The Iraqis really do have something to complain about.

http://www.alternet.org/story/70886/...ldren_orphaned
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-chi...worth-it/30760
http://web.mit.edu/humancostiraq/