The vote isn't about the situation as it was or as it is. It's about how things will be in the future, and some might argue that information on what happens if I vote "No" would come in handy.
For instance:
Are we staying in the EU or not? Can anyone tell us now that The Lords have rather made a mockery of the EU Referendum promise.
How will Scotland be funded... Is the Barnett formula going to be scrapped if we stay in the UK.
Will there be more powers devolved to the Scottish parliament as recommended by the Calman Commission, or are the main parties going to continue to ignore his recommendations.
I know, or at least I've been told, that after voting "Yes" there will be an attempt to get rid of nuclear missiles from the Clyde.
What if I vote "No", are we replacing Trident?
If I vote "Yes" we're concentrating on Green Energy (whether I like it or not, but that's beside the point, because at least I know). If I vote "No", then what? Fracking and Gas? Nuclear? Green? Flavour of the month?
So that's just a few reasons as to why the no vote needs to give some answers.
The White Paper may be a wish list, but it is at least a statement of intent. The no side don't even have that?
I'm much the same, glossed over it. But I'd suspect that that puts us in a very small minority, I doubt that most folk have even bothered.
It does read much like a wishlist I suppose, but I guess publishing a Plan B would be a bit like admitting deafeat before you've even started. The SNP argument is all about hope for the future, so you can see why they've done it. Just don't ask me to believe it all.
But there's one thing a lot of people appear to have overlooked, and that is that Independence and SNP aren't the same thing. There's no reason, at least in theory, why the Conservatives couldn't be the first government of an Independent Scotland.